Closing of Social Security Field Offices Disrupted SSI Benefits for Thousands, Lawsuit Charges
Plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit against the Social Security Administration (SSA) might describe it as an open-and-shut case. When the SSA closed its field offices at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, it remained open for the purposes of denying benefits. But, plaintiffs say, the agency was effectively shut for low-income elderly adults and people with disabilities who needed to validate claims, or who sought to challenge the agency’s denial of their claims. The result: thousands of beneficiaries whose benefits were wrongfully reduced or discontinued, according to the suit.
Posted on November 8, 2021
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is the basic federal safety net program for the elderly, blind and disabled, providing them with a minimum guaranteed income. As of September 2021, some 2.3 million people aged 65 or older were receiving SSI payments.
SSI recipients are required to demonstrate that they meet income and resource limits each month in order to qualify for assistance, and they must promptly report any changes in their financial circumstances that might affect their status. Failure to perform this routine, which traditionally many have done in person at local field offices, can result in the denial of benefits and a demand for repayment of benefits already sent.
While the SSA made provisions for people to report their information by phone, fax or mail after closing its offices in March 2020, this was easier said than done for the elderly and people with disabilities, according to the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, by the advocacy group Justice in Aging and others on behalf of a group of SSI recipients whose benefits were unlawfully reduced or terminated.
“These recipients—who are disabled, elderly, or both—are at high risk for serious consequences from COVID-19, which limits their ability to venture into their communities to secure needed documentation, go to the post office or to send faxes to SSA,” the lawsuit reads. Furthermore, even when recipients did file their information on time, often the SSA failed to process it for months, only to rule later that the beneficiaries had been overpaid and would have their future benefits docked.
Even a no-fault waiver of overpayment debts that the SSA issued in August 2020 did not mitigate the issue, because it was too limited, the lawsuit argues. For instance, to qualify for the waiver, the overpayment had to have occurred before September 30, 2020, and must have been brought to the SSA’s notice by the end of that year. Many people weren’t informed about the waiver, the lawsuit claims, and therefore could not apply for it.
Nearly 300,000 people have stopped receiving SSI since the closure of the offices, during a pandemic that has hit the elderly and those with disabilities particularly hard, the lawsuit notes. “Adults 65 and older have been the most at risk of death from COVID-19 and have constituted almost 80 percent of COVID-19 deaths. In addition, the risk of death from COVID-19 for persons with disabilities has been three times that of the general population.”
The plaintiffs, who are also represented by New York Legal Assistance Group and law firm Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, have demanded a jury trial.
More from our blog…
Estate Planning: An At-a-Glance Overview
Estate planning, or legacy planning, entails preparing your affairs for the future, including death and other life events. While older adults might give more thought [...]
Estate Planning for Your Digital Legacy
One aspect of your estate plan that you may not yet have taken into consideration is your digital legacy. Arranging what happens to your digital [...]
What Is a Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT)?
A qualified personal residence trust (QPRT) is an irrevocable trust used to achieve estate and gift tax savings. The basic idea behind a QPRT is to [...]
Limited Power of Attorney in Estate Planning
A power of attorney (POA) is a document that authorizes one or more parties (known as the “agent” or “attorney-in-fact”) to act on behalf of [...]